These clauses deal with exclusive use: language that gives away an exclusive right -- and therefore is sometimes said to create an “assignment” of the right -- so that the author him or herself loses the right.
These are some of the most important clauses, for it is through exclusive right assignments that an author gives up all of his or her rights.
Jump to examples of: Creator-Friendly Clauses, Could-Be-Worse Clauses, Creator-Unfriendly Clauses, Overreaching Clauses
These are clauses whose language is most generous to authors, and we consider them creator-friendly.
Clause Type:
- Exclusive Use
- Non-Exclusive Use
- New Media Rights
- Changes to the Work
- Geographic Scope
- Duration of Grant
- Grant Back
For:
These clauses have terms which aren’t the best we’ve seen but not the worst either, so they fall into our could-be-worse category. Be cautious with contracts and clauses of this type.
Clause Type:
- Exclusive Use
- Non-Exclusive Use
- New Media Rights
- Changes to the Work
- Geographic Scope
- Duration of Grant
- Grant Back
For:
In these clauses, the contract’s language takes more rights from creators than we think reasonable, and so they are designated creator-unfriendly.
CLAUSE:
The Work will be a work made for hire under the U.S. copyright laws. If a court determines that this agreement does not provide for the creation of a work made for hire, then you agree to give COMPANY its affiliated corporations and licensees exclusive publication rights of your Work for COMPANY, as well as the exclusive rights to reproduce, edit, adapt, modify, perform, transmit and otherwise use the Work, including any derivative works created therefrom, in any manner or medium throughout the world in perpetuity without additional compensation. This includes, but is not limited to, the right to reproduce and distribute the Work in electronic or optical media, or in CD-ROM, on-line or similar format.
Following your submission of the Work to COMPANY, COMPANY is willing to consider a request by you for a non-exclusive license to reproduce and/or distribute the Work to third parties. Any such request should be addressed to your editorial contact.
EXPLANATION:
This is an excerpt from a contract between a journalist or photographer and a major news service. This would look, at first glance, like a standard work-for-hire agreement. People who sign this, however, should consult our definition of work-for-hire and ensure that their project can be classified under this Section of the Copyright Act. Furthermore, the language in the second paragraph should be looked at closely. The Company may give the author the right to reproduce and/or distribute the work to third parties. This right is not guaranteed however, and must be agreed upon at the time the contract is signed. Also, the language of the contract seems to indicate that the author may only reproduce and/or distribute his work to a third party, which would not necessarily include the right to post the material on one's own website or allow others to reproduce the work. Further clarification on these points should be requested before this document is signed.
These are the contract clauses which are truly unreasonable, which we have designated incredibly overreaching.
